Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Stagnation Flow - Part II


In my last post, I mentioned that we’d be working with the stream function \(\Psi\), rather than the complex potential \(\Phi\), but I haven’t really defined it well. You’ll remember that \(\Phi\) is related to the velocity field as follows:
$${{d\Phi}\over{dz}}=\overline{V}=u-iv$$
where u and v are the velocities along the x and y axes, respectively. In plotting streamlines, I’ve noted that the imaginary part of \(\Phi\) is \(\Psi\).
$$\Phi =\phi + i\Psi$$
We shall ignore \(\phi\)(little "fee"), as its properties where friction is a factor are the reason we’re tossing \(\Phi\) aside in the first place! So how does \(\Psi\) relate to velocity?
$$\begin{align} u-iv & = {{d\Phi}\over{dz}}\\ & = {{d\Phi}\over{dx}}\\ & = {{d\phi}\over{dx}}+i{{d\Psi}\over{dx}}\\ -iv & = i{{d\Psi}\over{dx}}\\ v & = -{{d\Psi}\over{dx}}\end{align}$$
Above we let dz = dx. Now we let dz = idy.
$$\begin{align} u-iv & = {{d\Phi}\over{dz}}\\ & = {{d\Phi}\over{i dy}}\\ & = {{d\phi}\over{i dy}}+i{{d\Psi}\over{i dy}}\\ & = -i{{d\phi}\over{i dy}}+{{d\Psi}\over{dy}}\\ u & = {{d\Psi}\over{dy}}\end{align}$$
Now we have velocity in terms of the stream function, which will prove to be useful in my next posting, in which we plug the stream function into Navier-Stokes.

1 comment:

  1. In retrospect, it's a lousy title, as there's nothing unique to stagnation flow in this post. On the other hand, it does match the flow of my work, and I think that going from complex potential, as derived as a description of the velocity field, to the stream and potential functions, is more comprehensible than the traditional way of introducing the complex potential as an artificial construct of the more abstract scalar functions.

    ReplyDelete